bionengineering.blogg.se

Litespeed web server compare
Litespeed web server compare










Think of a server as a restaurant: people come in (traffic), order food (request web pages), and eat (view those pages), then finally pay their bills, and leave. If this doesn’t make sense, read our analogy: In peak hours, your memory utilization may rise exponentially. The problem with process-based architectures is that there’s a lot of memory overhead: there are as many processes as active connections. There is a master process that spawns a new process for every new HTTP request it receives. We’ve summarised the features below into this TL DR comparison table infographic:Īpache has a process-based architecture: each HTTP request is handled by a separate process. TL DR infographic: LiteSpeed vs NGINX vs Apache A BuiltWith graph showing the web server distribution in South Africa. In South Africa, Apache still reigns supreme, but as people become aware of LiteSpeed’s capabilities word will spread from abroad to South African shores, as it so often does. A BuiltWith graph showing LiteSpeed’s growing popularity of their Web Server

litespeed web server compare

It’s compatible with many of Apache’s features like. It’s designed as an Apache drop-in replacement, meaning it’s coded to seamlessly drop in, read, and replace Apache files with a hitch. As with NGINX, they took a good look at long-time leader Apache and prioritised speed and customisability. LiteSpeed is the newest of these three challengers, and fast becoming one of the more popular choices. A BuiltWith graph showing NGINX usage over time, currently experiencing a small drop in market share LiteSpeed Now, it’s transformed into a web server of its own and is the most popular choice around the world.

#Litespeed web server compare software#

Basically, software that helped web servers balance the load of requests and demands. Back then it was a reverse proxy and load balancer. NGINX was originally created to improve the function of Apache. Pronounced as Engine X, NGINX is LiteSpeed’s top competitor when it comes to speed and event driven scalability. This was helped by the fact that the software is super user-friendly (more so than NGINX), so a rudimentary knowledge of hosting should be enough to set it up. It was the most popular for quite some time. Apache is a reliable web server and has been around since 1995. Let’s start with Apache since it’s the oldest of the three. Introducing our contenders: LiteSpeed, NGINX, Apache Apache A W3techs graph showing the most used web servers at present Take a look at this recent report on web servers usage. Hopefully, this’ll help you better decide which web server is an ideal fit for your personalised needs. Now let’s look at how the top 3 web servers fare against each other, in different departments like speed, configuration, OS compatibility, and more. That’s basically all that a web server does. Think of servers as the bookshelves in a library, and web server technology like LiteSpeed, NGINX, and Apache as the speedy librarian who fetches and serves the books to readers. These books need to be stored somewhere, that’s where web servers come into place. As with physical books, websites come in different sizes, some with many web pages, graphics, and other HTML elements. If a website is a book, web pages would be the regular pages of said book. Once again, it’s the web server’s responsibility to serve each of them with the requested content, simultaneously, and as fast as possible. For example, if a user enters, the web server must return a response that renders the web hosting page on the user’s browser.Īt any time, there can be several users trying to visit different pages of a website. It’s a web server’s responsibility to look at the contents of the request, and send an appropriate response.

litespeed web server compare

Whenever you enter the URL of a website in your browser, a HTTP/HTTPS request is sent to the web server that’s hosting the website. Let’s look at these nuances.Ī web server is software that stores or hosts all the files (graphical elements, source code, etc.) that make up a website. However, if you get down to the technical details, you’ll start noticing some subtle nuances, which may make you choose one over the other. You can’t really go wrong with either of them. All three platforms are stable, well-maintained, and feature-rich. You’ve probably heard compelling arguments for the most popular options: LiteSpeed, NGINX, and Apache. Web servers are arguably the most important factor to consider while choosing a host. So, you’re shopping around for the perfect web hosting provider, but you’re also keen to see what web server technology they’re using, and you have good reason to do so.










Litespeed web server compare